SPACE X AND WHY THE WORLD NEEDS UAP TECHNOLOGY
IN LESS THAN a hundred years, we humans went from the horse and cart of the early twentieth century to boots on the moon by 1969. No one can argue that the last century wasn’t a remarkable period in history for human technological development. We excelled in such a short period of time and probably more in a hundred years than in the previous ten thousand years combined. You might argue this was no more evident than with space-flight application technology, the dawn of which began in the early twentieth century following theoretical and practical breakthroughs by Konstantin Tsiolkovsky and Robert H. Goddard.
Whilst the former Soviet Union took the initiative to propel itself in the Cold-War Space Race, putting the first man, woman and dog in space, America played catch-up. It wasn’t long however before they caught up quickly, employing former Nazi scientists to their rocket science division of research and development. Most famous of these, was a German physicist by the name of Wernher Von Braun, whose V2 rockets bombed London during World War II, and who would eventually become influential in putting a man on the moon with NASA.
Laika - The Russian dog was the first animal to orbit the Earth in 1957.
©AssociatedPress/NASA
The emerging rocket technology was based upon very crude chemical thrust propulsion: you invoke a catalyst and then that reaction pushes you forward. Linear inertia propulsion was susceptible to atmospheric gravity and other more preventative limitations. The thick density of Earth’s lower stratosphere ensures that you will require ample thrust and an aerodynamic shape to effectively penetrate the upper atmosphere.
Additionally, this technology comes with significant risk to multi-billion dollar equipment and more importantly, to the brave, patriotic astronauts who go boldly. Historically, this is a dangerous mission. The Challenger spacecraft that exploded on route to outer space, cost the lives of seven astronauts aboard with only seventy-three seconds gone into the launch. Miscalculated variables that had a domino effect and would eventually ensure that ‘atmosphere x thrust’ destroyed the Challenger rocket.
To this day, we continue to send brave men and women into space, strapped to a shuttle that is propelled by ignited nitroglycerin, an (un)safe controlled explosive reaction that propels the occupant up through a densely saturated atmosphere. We do it because that is our best assessment of travel, our best and brightest minds fixated on one avenue of innovative research. Rocket propulsion.
And this is where we currently find ourselves, stuck on the launchpad.
Eighty years of rocket propulsion technology, for all its proud innovation, excellence and attention to scientific provocation, it undoubtedly fails us. It allows for critical limitation, it allows for a iron-clad barrier to shut down progression into the wider existence of known special reality. The nearest star system is that of Proxima Centauri at 40,208,000,000,000 km away, even at its closet point reports suggest it would take four years, three months at light speed, and eighty thousand years with the fastest rocket propulsion.
Then there is the added issue of your craft being destroyed by micro meteorites, a lack of fuel, protection against radiation, the list goes on an on. Despite recent enthusiasm by some theorising scientists for reaching our nearest neighbours within twenty years, the problems of rocket propelled interstellar travel are incredibly vast and diverse.
Space X’s SN10 sits on the launchpad in Boca Chica, Texas.
To reach the stars we need to extend our knowledge and understanding beyond current scientific spaceflight application comprehension. How likely that is depends on various factors, but for now, the financial investment and government contracts are being funnelled into companies such as SpaceX who chase down the dream of thinking differently, but from the very same launchpad as those who have gone before.
Elon Musk tweeted on March 4th that his prototype, designated for a high-altitude test flights, had successfully landed after launch. The rocket propelled starship prototype, entitled as ‘Serial Number 10’ (SN10) safely touched down in Boca Chica, Texas. This came in contrast to its direct predecessors SN8 and also SN9, both of which crashed into the ground.
The applauders came quickly across social media, with positive comments and feedback for a truly remarkable effort. Which it is, given the circumstances.
“Insane that it only took 3 attempts to do what many considered impossible just two or three years back. We truly are living in the future. Congrats @elonmusk and @SpaceX on this incredible feat.”
Elon was quick to reply accepting the the mission had been a successful one, praising his team at SpaceX.
“SpaceX team is doing great work! One day, the true measure of success will be that Starship flights are commonplace.”
However, despite the success of an effective land, there were adverse consequences as the SN10 rocket reportedly put down heavily on its extended legs. From the videos it was clear that a small fire had started to develop around the bottom of the craft and then an explosion occurred, SN10 was completely destroyed in the process, launching thousands of feet on its axis and then smashing back down into the landing pad. Despite the third destruction of the SN series prototype, SpaceX will be rightly enthusiastic that progress has been made.
The huge spacecraft was successful at amending the mistakes of the previous two launches, corrections that allowed touchdown.
SpaceX and its team have pushed the ball forward within the civilian spaceflight application arena. Most famously, the Falcon9 rocket that stands at 70m (229ft) is a heavy launch vehicle capable of transporting payloads into outer orbit. With 68 confirmed landings from 108 launches it is the premier reusable two-stage rocket. The endeavours and accomplishments of the spaceflight company have given Elon Musk a lofty stature, with comparisons to the fictional Marvel character Tony Stark, an eccentric and brilliant billionaire.
According to Space X “Falcon 9 is a reusable, two-stage rocket designed and manufactured by SpaceX for the reliable and safe transport of people and payloads into Earth orbit and beyond. Falcon 9 is the world’s first orbital class reusable rocket. Reusability allows SpaceX to refly the most expensive parts of the rocket, which in turn drives down the cost of space access.”
Arguably, the cost effective element of reusable rocket propulsion is critical to partnerships with organisations such as NASA and who can argue with their mission statement. They changed the game with regards to civilian spaceflight application. Arguably, their current place in history would be acceptable to that of intrepid pioneers, Elon Musk himself as the technologically advanced Ironman, displaying the most advanced developed machinery in the known universe.
The problem from that perspective, is Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) technology. In very recent years we have seen the Senate Select Committee for Intelligence (SSCI) request the Department of Defense establish a task force to investigate UAP, (the Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force: UAPTF) along with this we have seen the Senate Armed House Committee (SAHC) receive classified briefings.
Here we are now seeing advanced anomalous vehicles (AAV) so extreme and beyond compare in scope and practice that they make the SpaceX rockets look like archaic relics, much in the same way others might look back at the caveman as he wields fire for the first time. And this is the sticking point, most people fail to truly understand the implications of such a radical technology.
As an example, take the AAVs that engaged the U.S.S. Nimitz carrier strike group in the November of 2004. Multiple pilots, radar operators and military personnel describe the AAV as a forty foot long white object that resembled a giant ‘Tic-Tac’, it had no wings, no exhaust, no rotors, no visible signs of propulsion. This AAV was able to hover above the surface of the ocean, move left, right, forwards, backwards abruptly like a ‘ping-pong’ ball. Cmdr. David Fravor (one of four Navy Pilots on record) reported to the New York Times that the object’s speed was immensely fast and essentially was able to transcend the horizon in the blink of an eye. Chad Underwood, the pilot who captured the Tic-Tac video would later describe the AAV as defying the laws of physics. The AAVs extreme propulsion was later investigated by the Scientific Coalition for UAP studies who released a 270 page report.
Then we see UAP technology in the form of the Gimble video, which was captured on January 2015, declassified and released by the Department of Defense in April 2020. The AAV in the video travels against the wind, stops, rotates on its axis to then fly belly up (occluding to pilot reports). The case a involves the U.S.S. Roosevelt (2014/15) and pilots who flew out of Oceana airbase prior to deployment to Syria. Navy Pilots Graves and Accoin reported to the New York Times that cube shaped objects that almost collided with fighter F/18 jets at close range, and flew in formation behind the AAV (flying disc shaped object) before stopping and turning in unison.
And finally, we have the infamous black triangle AAV that was apart of a UAPTF intelligence report, which apparently displays the ability of transmedium travel as it is somehow able to transcend the ocean to atmosphere barrier with no clear means of obvious thrust propulsion. Keep in mind nothing is currently in the civilian world that allows for travel between two differing mediums. Possibly, the issue of Unidentified Submerged Objects (USOs) might prove to become better understood within the next five years.
This UAP technology is exotic, radical and beyond next generation. Unfortunately, the sheer awesome power that this extreme type of physics and technology display is far beyond the scope of vehicles we currently have in private companies such as Richard Branson’s Virgin Galactic or Elon Musk’s SpaceX. The technology of Tic-Tacs, cubes, flying discs or triangles may as well be magic in comparison to heavy payload rockets that would instantly relegate Musk from Tony Stark to Justin Hammer overnight. (But obviously, that would only depend on the world knowing the actual reality of this radical technology deployed by AAVs).
One final thought
Within 180 days (taking us to summer 2021) an unclassified report submitted via the UAPTF courtesy of the Director of National Intelligence’s office will give congress information about these advanced anomalous vehicles that fall under the category of UAP. If everything goes to plan, we should see some forthcoming conclusions (maybe even evidence) that leads us to a full bodied DOD program of investigation that works with the armed forces of the United States.
On Thursday (04/03/21) a UAPTF associate, Christopher Mellon – (former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence in the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations and later for Security and Information Operations + Former Staff Director of the United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence) took to social media to suggest that the United States airforce has been involved with UAP encounters and this should be clarified in the upcoming report.
“USAF encounters and reports have been going on for years at NORAD and elsewhere. The UAP report requested by the Senate should help to clarify the situation.”
Whereas in recent years it has been the United States Navy who has spearheaded the initiative to disclose and investigate the issue, the airforce has remained alarmingly silent since 1969 and the closure of their Project Blue Book. However, given the reported tendency for these vehicles to occupy various altitudes as well as emerging from deep within the worlds oceans, there must be some accountability from one of the largest forces within the DOD.
The last thought on this technological issue comes from the third transmedium, outer space. The AAV objects that operate in the stratosphere and potentially above.
We make reference to the radar operator Kevin Day who reported that the Tic-Tac AAV (U.S.S. Nimitz, 2004) was coming down from at least 80,000ft which is around 24.3 kilometres high (as high as their SPY1-AN detection equipment could track) but in reality, they could have been coming down from further up. Should these AAV be coming from the mesosphere (50 – 80 kilometres/ 30 – 50 miles) or thermosphere (85 kilometres + / 55 miles +) then we need to look towards the data and investigation from another force, the United States Space Force.
With these amazing AAV technological abilities in mind, consider the latest, most advanced rocket propulsion technology of SpaceX as it attempts and struggles to reach the stratosphere and behind before returning to Earth and landing safely. If this is the best we currently have, then just how far advanced are these Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon? If they belong to someone else, then who? If they belong to a classified program within DOD, then that raises some very serious legal and ethical questions as we continue to pump billions into civilian and Defense contractor rocket propulsion programs. If this is Russia or China then we are in serious trouble.
The answer to this may be uncomfortable, it may cause problems and even change how our global economic infrastructure is orientated, but this UAP issue transcends all else. It is a transformation we must face if we are to evolve ourselves and one day travel to the stars.
