TRANSMORPHING ANOMALOUS PHENOMENA
Does the Anomalous Phenomena have the ability to
transform itself into anything it wishes?
THE DISTINCTION OF the five observables being part of AATIP was profound. It showed us that such a UAP technology existed and was being investigated by DoD. In our own case report history, we see that in some cases the UAP was able to display one or two of the observables, in other cases the UAP displayed all five. Any of these technologies on their own would be a leap forward and revolutionary, but having all five is something radically different, and, beyond next generation. Maybe even beyond the next few generations. What about other, as of yet known abilities?
What about: ‘Trans-morphia.’
Trans-morphic abilities would be the intelligent ability to create and change your physical makeup and appearance at the quantum level whilst in motion (or motionless). Let’s be clear. This does not exist within a human capacity. We simply don’t have an understanding, or application of a technology that morphs matter at the atomic layer into something new. This concept, as an ability, doesn’t exist to us right now. At least not beyond my own pondering and unconventional imagination. As you might think, this would be too extreme for the first phases of any planned disclosures for the general public. That’s even if ‘Trans-morphia’ is a viable ability of genuine UAP.
This technology surely is far, far, far beyond us right now. Nanotechnology doesn’t exist at the atomic level; we can’t change the makeup of an atomic cluster.
However, such ‘trans-morphic’ UAP cases do exist officially and are recognised historically. Unfortunately, what we have is very poor data, if at all you could call it data. We have a random assortment of cases that aren’t true cases, information which can’t be classed as verified information. We have tabloid-level stories that have no evidentiary sources or supporting information. Any normal person would dismiss the idea out of hand, but I’m not normal, and I’m certainly not one to dismiss and interesting concept, no matter how insane it might seem.
Cases of Trans-Morphing UAP technology
This is where we get really interested. Whilst the vast majority of such cases are stepped over my mainstream Ufology, for me the ideological implications of something that can transform itself at the quantum level is incredible. If you are a pseudo-sceptic, you might look at ‘Flying Discs’ and ‘Tic-Tac’ reports and dismiss them due to the cognitive barriers and surjective bias that such things simply can’t exist, therefore they don’t exist – then proceed to explain them away with Seagulls and balloons. We aren’t even talking about anything truly exceptional beyond the ‘nuts and bolts’ vehicles with physical substance here either. We all know debunkers love to talk extra-terrestrials.
Philosophically, we should now imagine that there is a phenomena beyond that ideology, maybe a phenomenon that can manipulate localised space/time to its own desire. Hypothetically, this would be an extreme form of nanotechnology at the atomic layering, rearranging and restructuring the fabric of its own physical makeup. Imagine, it is creating a multitude of Earthly elements from the quantum level, clustering and forming atoms to bind together to form what we crudely know to be objects. Complete mastery over chemicals, metals, fabrics, materials, cells, ‘genetic biological tissues’ or even ‘conscious beings’, and instantly interjecting them within reality much the way our ‘3D printers’ print out new objects for us to use.
This hypothetical UAP technology would be God-like and, ‘for them, reality is negotiable’.
Can we also consider that the anomalous phenomena could be ‘secreting’ themselves into our collective conscious universe using the building blocks of the periodic table as a painting palette for some unknown intention?
Possibly they or it, might do this at the exact point of origin into this universe, or at some point whilst they/it is here.
Simply, unimaginable.
As you might consider, these case reports are not really promoted by mainstream Ufologists, it’s hard enough to get the world to accept solid formed shapes never-mind this beyond radical idea, if that’s what it actually is. The other problem is that we know the mainstream will always look at such cases and determine that they must all be balloons and other weird assortments floating and changing shape under atmospheric conditions – which makes sense and I’m sure accounts for the vast majority of reports are exactly that.
Again, we are faced with the same old theme of the data not being good enough even remotely start concluding.
The National UFO Reporting Centre has a wealth of case reports going back to the 1960s, and in particular 2357 reports of ‘changing shape’ UAPs. I read a rather impressive triangular shaped UAP by researcher David Marler, who cites various cases of ‘shape-shifting’ triangles, however, unfortunately doesn’t give any further details which make it difficult to pursue and evaluate.
Instead, we looked into what we had available. If one looks across the internet there is a wealth of UAP cases on which unknown objects are said to have changed in shape, size and colour.
One 2007 case reported over India, stated a round aerial object changed shape to a triangle and then into a straight line, it also ‘emitted a bright light that formed a circle - almost a halo - and also radiated a range of colours’.
And then in 2020 over Bogotá, Colombia reports stated a ‘hexagonal shape’ changed into a ‘black cube’ shape. In 2018, there was the strange case of an aerial object over New Jersey, America, that appeared in which a long black object that changed shape quickly.
The Daily Star reported in 2020 that a 15-17-minute-long video made its way to YouTube (9). The apparent unknown aerial object in question, ‘shows the bright round orange object changing its shape to a triangle or a boomerang.’
Another case from 2020, this time in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, involved video camera footage that captured an object morphing from a five-pointed star to a pyramid in a matter of seconds. The audio sounds authentic, however the case lacks in-depth and on-record testimony that gives context to the aerial objects.
Naturally, without the context of such cases we are left with considering hoaxes and misidentifications. The internet is flooded with these types of cases.
The problem is we cannot appropriately identify such a technological phenomenon from birds, balloons or drones, currently. We simply dismiss ‘trans-morphing’ UAP and such things as balloons or errand plastic bags that change shape with the wind at high/low altitude. Unfortunately, there isn’t enough available data in these cases to even compile a cold case review and UAP case report. Rumours are that TTSA are developing a system which might use A.I. to identify such unknowns, but nothing had come forward in 2018.
The other issue, as with most of these encounters and cases, is that they are firmly planted within the civilian world and even within mainstream Ufology and are not well understood. They are complex in their own right and rightly open to critical evaluation. If we look at such cases, we could point to a lack of witness testimony, a lack of military testimony and a lack of sensory data, clear pictures, gun camera footage and radar data which would help us grasp what exactly is being observed.
Should this proposed technology exist, it may have gone completely under the radar due to its untenable nature. The closest thing we currently have in the civilian world to understanding this extreme ‘nanotechnology’ type of ability is when Tony Stark ‘morphs’ into Iron Man in the beginning of the brilliant Avengers film: ‘Infinity War’. Beyond that, we don’t have any real technology within aerospace that would explain this ability, if it even is a technology at all, and not some living plasma-based life form.
This might be a conversation for future generations. Essentially, we would need military case reports and data to fully understand what exactly these things are truly capable of doing. Plus, we would need to see the atomic layering to give a baseline of how such structures are created, maintained and changed. The gravitational ‘Strong Force’ keeps atoms glued together (it’s why our bodies and objects don’t separate). As atoms themselves are affected by gravity and produce their own gravitational field, such a trans-morphing ability would need to be able to affect the gravitational field of Earth and the individual fields of the atom themselves. Then the subatomic particles that would make up a ‘Flying Disc’ would need to be arranged, clustered together at the quantum level to form that object in this reality.
Now much has been wrote about the long-term change of the historical UAP appearance - I strongly suggest you read all of John Keel and Jacques Vallée and the inter-dimensional – Ultra-Terrestrial element.
If we look at how the appearance of the phenomenon has changed from decade to decade, century to century we might get a better picture and even apply ‘trans-morphia’ as an explanation.
At the end of the 19th century the ‘Mysterious Airships’ reportedly performed amazing abilities well before the first aeroplane. The wave of airship objects changed with time (despite outliers being evident in other minor waves).
The classic waves of ‘Flying Discs’ that appeared in the 1940s and 1950s changed in frequency, replaced by the giant ‘Black Triangles’ that started in the 1960s and was more known throughout the 1990s – see the research and literature around the ‘Belgium wave’.
To link all of these phenomena might seem premature, and it would be scientifically foolish to associate cold cases without hard evidence. Having said that, the point still stands, what has been reported by multiple witnesses over the past two centuries had changed. This change of shape and observation has led most researchers to ignore the reported objects which don’t for their narrative.
How accurate is it to associate UAP with ‘trans-morphic technology’, that has the ability to literally change its shape?
Instantly?
This is the stuff of science fiction and is actually the case with regards to Hollywood. Remember the film, Flight of the Navigator, as a kid I loved that film and in my naïve innocence had no idea the craft was based on Ufology reports of ‘Flying Saucers.’
Released in 1987 the film was released and incorporated a silver ‘Flying Saucer’ object that was able to change its shape based upon its propulsion needs. This was a fictional concept, one that implied an alien vehicle morphs its own shape to intentionally engage a specific task. To go faster it must become more streamlined.
With regard to the craft’s propulsion, the film’s story ensures the ‘Flying Saucer’ morphs for our benefit as the viewer - rather than for a sense of rationale or logistical appropriate aerodynamic function. Aka, in reality the craft wouldn’t need to morph into an aerodynamic streamlined shape as the craft isn’t using chemical/linear thrust propulsion to cut through Earth’s thick atmosphere like a plane or rocket would (which is proven in the film by the craft’s vertical climb into outer space in seconds).
This interested me as theoretical concept. Although the film was fictional, the inaccuracies actually mirrored what we are seeing within the current day phenomenon. Despite hypothetically being well in advance of human technology, this anomalous phenomenon is flawed, and flawed in ways it shouldn’t be flawed.
For example, we have the ‘Mysterious Airships’ of the late 19th century which make no sense aerodynamically and shouldn’t have been able to fly in the way they do. Then we see hyper advanced anomalous vehicles outperforming navy fighter jets, and yet they allegedly crash in the New Mexico desert. Some have suggested that human technology brought them down with electro-magnetic-pulse (EMP) weapons.
I struggle to accept this. Even if EMP weapons can affect their navigation systems etc, they definitely shouldn’t. These are vehicles that have an understanding at the quantum level, are potentially thousands of years more advanced in technology and yet they get brought down by an EMP device in the early 20th century?
Does that sound right to you?
No, me neither.
Then we see reports of ‘Flying Discs’ rotating in mid-air to a standstill before taking off at grey speed - but they are ‘wobbly’ in lower atmosphere and ‘clunky’ in rotation (‘GIMBAL’, 2015).
We see reports of pointless little grey men inside and outside a ‘Flying Disc’ craft but for no obvious reasons - arguably they don’t need to be in there - why not simply send the hyper advanced probes to collect data?
Why do they pretend like proximity is relevant to them and whatever their mission is?
We have ‘Tic-Tac’ objects which interact with pilots, employing human mirroring techniques. The ‘Tic-Tac’ doesn’t need to be affected by humans in any way. Cloak and avoid should
For a technology well beyond human understanding and application, some of these technological behaviours and unforgiving errors don’t make sense to me. And this particularly the case if they are able to manipulate space-time at the quantum level.
Hypothetically, anything with the ability to change itself at the atomic/quantum level should be, in theory, indestructible, impervious, unaffected by the elements of Earth as it goes about its unknown agenda. Anything that understands and manipulates molecular atoms at the quantum level shouldn’t crash in the desert or wobble on low atmosphere, clunk in rotation, or be influenced in behaviour by the appearance of an F-18 fighter jet.
If the anomalous phenomena have ‘trans-morphic’ abilities, then nothing should be able to phase it. And certainly nothing us primitive primates could think up in the 20th century. So, either it doesn’t have such an advanced technological ability, or it does, and if it does then we are missing a massive part of this puzzle and UAP is even more complex than we first thought.
Again, the problem as always, is proving such things in a world which doesn’t accept UAP.
