THE UAPTF REPORT HAS CHANGED EVERYTHING
‘The White House has been briefed on the UAP Report.’
Washington Correspondent, Kellie Meyer, 25/06/2021
LATE FRIDAY NIGHT, on June 25th, I had prompted Washington Correspondent Kellie Meyer to ask the UAP report question of the White House. Ever the optimist, I was delighted to find she did just that - although I’m sure that was always her plan regardless of what a persistent ‘UAP Activist’ says on social media. In what seemed to take an eternity, the clock passed 9pm as news filtered through to an anxious community that the report was but an hour away. This was a big moment, a moment which was expected to reverse 52 years of government opinion on a topic thwarted with stigma, denial and ridicule, and to those of us who knew it’s implications, it certainly didn’t disappoint.
SATURDAY 26th of June, 2021
The wet summer morning brought an air of beleaguered optimism that only a few dare to breath in. The majority wake to their morning coffee and busy themselves about the day with all manner of weekend tasks, unaware that another step in the disclosure process had unfolded, and a pretty big one at that. In a stark comparison, the relatively muted news of an established UAP Task Force back in August 2020 was greeted by the British media in similar ignorance to the highly unusual report released late Friday evening. A report that in time would potentially come to change everything we understand about quantum physics (foundations of UAP). Big words I know.
Recently, we at UAPMedia have wrote strongly worded letters to Parliament about the dangers of ignoring UAP technology that is currently to this day, engaging nuclear strike groups on the East and West coast of America. We have also questioned why the British government remains dormant In what could become the greatest Western failure of intelligence since 9/11 and 7/7.
Arguably, we can say that without the correct processes of government and media acting upon objective assessment information, we generally do not become engaged in matters that seem immediately irrelevant to how our day to day life operates. One might argue that it is a free democratic system based on verified scientific fact that determines the doctrine of legislation, rather than the pseudo-speculation of the mis-informed individual. A critical important point when discussing the issue of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP). Consider that an official government report is the highest standard outside of mainstream academic institutions, and more so when the United States military have access to military case report data to assess and evaluate. Their conclusions are important, regardless of what pseudoscience debunkers and their YouTube followers try to convince you of.
But it hasn’t always been so easy going, UAP or ‘UFOs’ have for 50 plus years been considered fringe and the stuff of tabloid rubbishing, experiencers mocked and researchers ignored. Activism in social media wasn’t even a thing until 2017.
We are all aware of how Condon Report killed the American ‘UFO’ issue in 1969, and how the Condign Report killed the British UAP issue in 2000. The conclusions of these two dismissive reports prevented intelligence agencies from having to provide the executive defence oversight branches of Congress and Parliament with data/briefings relating to UFOs/UAP.
What many fail to realise is that Friday night destroyed those reports and there 52 year implications.
The release of the UAPTF report that came through the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), and with it the acknowledgement that not all UAP are easily explainable (keep in mind there is a classified annex not released). In fact, they go a step further and advocate that there is an unexplained advanced technology in the skies. Something Condon and Condign took deliberate steps to ensure wasn’t concluded upon. Further more, the ODNI showed that of the 144 cases examined (80 with multiple sensory data), only one was was identified with a high degree of confidence – a deflated balloon – almost an ironic jab to those who have infamously and historically inserted that weather balloons are responsible for all UAP sightings.
‘And a Handful of UAP Appear to Demonstrate Advanced Technology
“In 18 incidents, described in 21 reports, observers reported unusual UAP movement patterns or flight characteristics.
Some UAP appeared to remain stationary in winds aloft, move against the wind, manoeuver abruptly, or move at considerable speed, without discernible means of propulsion. In a small number of cases, military aircraft systems processed radio frequency (RF) energy associated with UAP sightings.
The UAPTF holds a small amount of data that appear to show UAP demonstrating acceleration or a degree of signature management. Additional rigorous analysis are necessary by multiple teams or groups of technical experts to determine the nature and validity of these data. We are conducting further analysis to determine if breakthrough technologies were demonstrated.”
The report is, as our friend Mr. Elizondo has stated, ‘Historic’. Only a select few across the UAP Research Community recognised its true significance that Saturday morning, the rest were angry, frustrated and disappointed that the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force did not disclose that ‘extraterrestrials’ were flying around our skies in ‘UFOs’. The usual conspiracy bell rang out. Something we are careful not to speculate upon to deeply without evidence. Additionally, whilst we reserve judgement on any UAP origin, we also accept a non-human UAP intelligence might also not solely equate to ‘aliens’ from another planet.
We at UAPMedia knew that this report wouldn’t say such things, we knew the meaning behind its intentions, their steps toward disclosure, and this was the biggest yet as it rolled back Projects Condon (USAF 1969) and Condign (UK MOD, 2000).
Keep in mind, the interim UAPTF report was never about assigned origin, it was about establishing a legal and officially sourced document that allows the American oversight committees within congress to act and push us forward. Essentially, we received an ‘inconclusive’ conclusion that requested further government investigation, and this allows the process to continue.
“The UAPTF report attempted to breakdown the 144 cases into five broad categories, four of which covered balloons, birds, airborne debris, weather phenomenon, secret US tech and foreign adversaries devices. The fifth is categorised as “Other”. These include those cases where limited data provide prevents analysis, but also where advances in scientific procedures would be required to better understand what was involved.”
Saturday afternoon turned into evening as the implications started to be understood and covered extensively in the American media. Former Director of National Intelligence, John Ratcliffe, a prominent voice in advocating the seriousness of UAP, again spoke out about the UAP technology and how it was under his office that the UAPTF was created.
“…technologies that we don’t have and frankly that we are not capable of defending against… based on multiple sensors.”
John Ratcliffe, speaking on Fox News, 26/06/2021, via Daniel Chaitin.
“A new intelligence document examines a hundred and forty-three sightings that might have been caused by errant balloons, foreign drones, or “Other”—a reserved way of saying aliens.”
Gideon Lewis-Kraus writes for the New Yorker on the UAPTF report.
Democrat Andre Carlson advocated he will push for hearings on UAP on the basis of the report findings and also suggested via social media that the report was much needed. Many other politicians and media organisations have shifted their perspective in light of the report findings which strongly advocate more funding, investigation and focus onto this potential threats.
But not everyone was happy with the contents of the report. The old school ‘Ufology’ types were somewhat pessimistic and disgruntled that the ‘alien’ bodies weren’t paraded in photos and videos (despite being told over and over for months this was a first interim report). On the other side of the fence, the UAP community and mainstream media suddenly realised that this technology, now officially verified and acknowledged, is a serious national security issue and report opened the door wide.
Within hours of the report, an official statement was released from the Department of Defense (DoD) that advocated further investigation on the basis of the UAPTF conclusions.
“To that end, Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks today directed the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security to develop a plan to formalize the mission currently performed by the UAPTF.”
DoD, Deputy Secretary of Defense, Kathleen Hicks 25/06/2021
It is now fully expected that a new UAP program or a newly funded UAP Task Force will be established to again address the critical failures of assessment within the interim report. We also understand that within the next 6-12 months we are going to see some very quick progression within the public’s understanding as we move through the phases and attempt to answer the question of ‘What Are UAP?’.
Overall, I am incredibly excited about what the UAPTF report has done, we as UAP activists, are still very much in the game, in fact we now have a extra man in our fight to push the U.K. government to take this issue seriously. This might be a problem for the British intelligence agencies, who have yet to speak publicly about the UAP issue (despite having access to the NSANET and UAP report), and persist in sending us response letters at UAPMedia stating there is no UAP threat to the realm. That might be about to change with a little friendly force.
Get ready, this is going to be an important year.
